On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 15:03:37 -0700
James Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it normal for bzip2 to be significantly slower than gzip?
> If not, where can I look for things that might be causing
> "bzip2 --fast" to take 50-60 times longer to compress a
> (sendmail log) file than gzip?
i never measured it to see if it is 50-60 times slower, but yes, gzip blows
bzip2 out of the water on speed. I wanted to use bzip2 to compress multi-GB
weblog files, but gzip beat it my miles, and bzip2 wasn't THAT much better @
compressing it to make it worth it.
The box I had tested this one was a Dual Opteron 250, 4 GB RAM, SATA drives
gmirrored, FreeBSD 6.1 (or 2), amd64.
_________________________
{Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex...
It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
direction." Albert Einstein
I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when wet.
Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have been
Warned.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
