> > Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote: > > <snip> > > himinbjorg# ldd work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf > > work/bdftopcf-1.0.1/bdftopcf: > > libXfont.so.1 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXfont.so.1 (0x28080000) > > libc.so.5 => /lib/libc.so.5 (0x280e6000) > > > > WHY when the cc step is stating -L/usr/local/lib is it bring the > > Xfont from /usr/X11R6/lib? > > > > Because /usr/X11R6 is a symlink to /usr/local, > drwxr-xr-x 16 root wheel 512 Jul 22 22:02 /usr/X11R6
Not yet... I haven't finished the upgrade. I'm still mid upgrade. I won't go any further until I find out whats happening. So thats not the case. > > and both appear in the > library path hints, so the first one listed gets used when resolving the > library paths at runtime. > So how did everyone else in the world get away without running into this? I see that it initially was put into /usr/X11R6 as part of xorg-libraries-6.9.0 . The additional Xfont came about because : 1) portupgrade was upgrading xorg-fonts-encodings-6.9.0_1 to encodings-1.0.2,1 2) portupgrade then realized it needed mkfontscale so started to work on that 3) mkfontscale needed libfontenc 4) With those 2 resolved, it then went for bdftopcf 5) bdftopcf needed libXfont So at this point it was installing libXfont when it already had the one from xorg-libraries-6.9.0 there, hence the problem apparently started. > (Hint: 'strings /var/run/ld-elf.so.hints' and 'ldconfig -r') > Ok, so what do I do now? I'm mid build, I don't have X installed or running, and I have atleast 1894 font files that are incorrect at the current moment.... I still don't get why I ran into this and others didn't. Did I miss a step that would have removed the xorg-libraries? Thanks, Tuc _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"