Hi. Thank you very much. See below. Regards, Dima. On 7/27/07, Nikola Lecic wrote:
No, make (BSD make) is a part of FreeBSD, gmake (GNU make) is a third-party application, available through devel/gmake port. They _are_ different.
Yes, I forgot there was an alias. See at the bottom of the message.
> and only with "gmake" I succeed to build serious projects. This is very interesting observation, could you expand on this?
Well, I don't want to make claims without basis, as it is based only on my memories :). I so completely switched to gmake during the winter that I even forgot I have an alias. I didn't succeeded to compile projects from my univ studies, but I afraid I use all those gnu extensions. I _think_ I didn't succeeded to compile the DEAL.II lib without gmake. These are projects that don't use the "recursive make" paradigm, at least not in all places. They "-include" makefiles from lower hierarchies, but I afraid gnu extension sit there in every place. Not shure, though ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/dsorkin]$ /usr/bin/make --version make: illegal option -- - usage: make [-BPSXeiknqrstv] [-C directory] [-D variable] [-d flags] [-E variable] [-f makefile] [-I directory] [-j max_jobs] [-m directory] [-V variable] [variable=value] [target ...] [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/home/dsorkin]$ alias make alias make='gmake' _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"