On Thu, 9 Aug 2007 15:11:06 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > a "perfectly acceptable alternative for home desktop users who have
> > previously known only Windows." It's not, and it never will be.
> never say never, but i wish too it will never be.
Please note that the original posting contains a hidden claim that
window$ is a perfect, eternal and god-given desktop system. Therefore
if you say that FreeBSD will never be a "perfectly acceptable
alternative..." to that, you agree with that hidden claim.
window$ as a desktop system is as wrong as it is as an "operating
system". In my opinion, FreeBSD set up as a desktop system is what a
desktop system should be, so FreeBSD with GUI apps _is_
-- or can be if you want -- a "perfect desktop system".
Or: "perfect desktop system" has nothing to do with m$'s approach.
To Latitude: if you can't accept this ^^^, then don't switch.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"