On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500
> >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection:
> swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+
> Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly?  Since, it is defined
> as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough.
I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched
all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port
 supported into USE_BDB.

USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on
the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version.  Also,
INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port
doesn't work with.


No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to