On 8/11/07, Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > >>>>> On Sat, 11 Aug 2007 12:37:18 -0500 > >>>>> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > swhetzel> Here's the correct code for BDB detection: > > swhetzel> USE_BDB= 40+ > > Why do you specify USE_BDB as 40+, explicitly? Since, it is defined > as 41+ in bsd.database.mk, I believe USE_BDB=yes is enough. > I believe when I made the change to bsd.database.mk, and then patched all of the BDB using ports, I had put the lowest version that the port supported into USE_BDB.
USE_BDB=yes would also work and allow the port to show a dependancy on the default BDB version instead of the lowest BDB version. Also, INVALID_BDB_VER takes care of excluding BDB versions that the port doesn't work with. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised. _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"