On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 13:18:11 +0100 Christopher Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] > I've gone for a portconf based solution for now, although, when I get > the chance, I'll try to test how portupgrade behaves wrt > dependencies. Please don't forget to try switching to portupgrade-devel in that case. According to /usr/ports/UPDATING recommendations (20070519): # portupgrade -f -o ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel portupgrade # ... (etc., do the rest in order to rebuild /var/db/ bits and to build or fetch the new INDEX.) If dependencies bug ever really existed (I can't remember that anyone confirmed that offering an example), it was related to non-devel version. > I would prefer to use pkgtools.conf for several reasons: [...] > 2) MAKE_ARGS get echoed when things are being built, whereas > arguments in make.conf don't seem to Agree here, this is sometimes the only 100% sure method to know how the binary in question was really built. Nikola Lečić _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"