On 8/29/07, Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nikola Lecic wrote: > > > C) port it! > > > > is the best. :) Seriously, if you really have a long term need for > > Net::LDAP module, then porting would be the most convenient for you and > > for others. > > It's already been done. I don't know why the port is called > p5-perl-ldap instead of p5-Net-LDAP though. Possibly it pre-dates > the current naming conventions. > > Cheers, > > Matthew
Ah, thanks so very much. It's option D) - the comfy chair! :) Kurt _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"