On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 12:41:45AM +0800, ronggui wrote: > I try to use zh_CN.UTF-8 as locales, but the FAT3 data can not display > correctly. When I use zh_CN.EUC as locale, things get better, but not > all the Chinese characters display correctly. > > In terms of UTF-8 support, Linux seems better than FreeBSD. How do you > guys think?
I don't have any FAT3 data, but I've been using UTF-8 locales on most of my desktop and server systems for years now and never experienced any serious problems. You have to expect a few surprieses - when dealing with ISO-8859-encoded data, for example, but overall my experience has been quite smooth. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
