NetOpsCenter writes: > Bill Moran wrote: > >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X? > > So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file > names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it > finishes its part.
1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list? 2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1 is lack of disk space. 3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument formats. But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively. Robert Huff _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"