NetOpsCenter writes:
>  Bill Moran wrote:

>  >Is there any reason you can't use OOo 2.X?
>  So I really dont care what the version is so long as the file
>  names reflect what the freebsd install error 1 gives when it
>  finishes its part.

        1) Have you asked on the openoffice@ mailing list?
        2) I'm with Bill - about the only reason to prefer 1.1 to 2.2.1
is lack of disk space.
        3) I know from experience a suitable jdk is required (at least
during compilation) for the 2.x series to handle OpenDocument
formats.  But the last I heard, it handles other formats natively.

                                Robert Huff
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to