Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-10-17 17:31, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> allen paul wrote: >> >>> Thank you, That was the peice of information I was looking for. >>> Sure, I will respect proper credits, and skip copyrighted >>> information. I might have been mistaken if I mistook BSD >>> documentation as freely distributed information under GNU license. >>> But, as long as I can post a few Kernel related excerpts, I think I >>> am good. >>> >> In general your going to find BSD a more permissive license then GPL >> (for sure less viral). Contact me privately if you need a good >> background references this as well other possible licensing options >> you may have. >> > > ... or ask here, on the freebsd-questions mailing list. There is no > reason why a discussion about the way the BSD license works would be > kept `private' in personal mailboxes :) > >
I was discussing some alternative to GPLand BSD licenses for his project... I don't want to get accused of using -questions to "recruit" _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"