Kirk Strauser said: > The main difference is that a flac file can be decompressed into a > bit-for-bit identical copy of the original file, whereas a decompressed > mp3 > bears almost no resemblance to the original.
Yes, not the first time today someone thought I was confued. Thanks. I thought a wav file and flac file occupied a similar place in the food-compression chain. So a good option would be to go from wav -> flac If I wanted to keep a lossless version of the recording around. > You would probably sample your tapes into a wav file, edit it to your > liking, then use flac for archival. -- Joe Sotham ------------ If the only prayer you say in your entire life is "Thank You", that will suffice. - Meister Eckhart To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message