Dear ~BAS, Thank you very much for your quick response. Here is what I did, as far as I can see exactly according to Security Advisory http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-07:08.openssl.asc.
<shell> %fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-07:08/openssl.patch openssl.patch 100% of 1051 B 6887 kBps %fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-07:08/openssl.patch.asc openssl.patch.asc 100% of 187 B 1325 kBps %pgp openssl.patch Pretty Good Privacy(tm) Version 6.5.8 Internal development version only - not for general release. (c) 1999 Network Associates Inc. Export of this software may be restricted by the U.S. government. File 'openssl.patch.asc' has signature, but with no text. Text is assumed to be in file 'openssl.patch'. Good signature from user "FreeBSD Security Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". Signature made 2007/10/03 21:48 GMT WARNING: Because this public key is not certified with a trusted signature, it is not known with high confidence that this public key actually belongs to: "FreeBSD Security Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". %cd /usr/src %patch < /root/openssl.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c |=================================================================== |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c,v |retrieving revision 184.108.40.206.2.1 |diff -u -d -r220.127.116.11.2.1 ssl_lib.c |--- crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 28 Sep 2006 13:02:36 -0000 18.104.22.168.2.1 |+++ crypto/openssl/ssl/ssl_lib.c 3 Oct 2007 17:01:24 -0000 -------------------------- File to patch: </shell> Now it comes up to the point where 'patch' is asking me which file to patch. The security advisory tells nothing about this as far as I can see. Actually I did not try cvsup/csup. One of the big advantages of FreeBSD is to me the easy Packages-System in sysinstall. Performance of KDE with all details is outstanding, so I see no need to compile the whole system from source. But maybe I will for the sake of it being cool... And I striktly refuse to be weak-at-shell!!!! :-) Best regards, Tino Engel > Subject: Re: Installing Security Advisories > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > CC: firstname.lastname@example.org > Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 13:07:47 -0400 > > > On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 17:42 +0100, Tino Engel wrote: > > So how can I find out, which file to tell 'patch' to patch? > > Why don't you paste the full input / output dialog from your patch > attempt and we will point out where you're making a syntactical error. > > Manual patching is not for the weak-at-shell. Did you try to cvsup/csup > your source tree instead? > > ~BAS > _________________________________________________________________ Eva sagt: „Kennst du schon den Adressimport für den Messenger?“ http://messenger.live.de/ersteschritte_adressimport.html_______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"