Rainer Schwarze wrote: > CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: >> Rainer Schwarze wrote: >>> I created 1000 files named "file000" ... "file0999" in a directory. I >>> could see all of them via Windows. >>> >>> I created 1000 files named "file-0000.file" ... "file-0999.file" in a >>> directory. I could see the first 130 files of them. >> Are you sure this is only happening with ext2fs? You might be running >> into a filename mangling limitation in Samba. [...] > However, everything works well when I put the same set of files on a UFS > volume shared by samba.
Just an update in case someone looks for the same problem: On the samba mailing list it was pointed out, that there are problems with non-UFS shares. In /usr/ports/UPDATING this snippet is included (which as it looks like I did not read carefully :-) ): | 20070919: | AFFECTS: users of net/samba3 | AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [...] | Bug #4715 (https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4715) is NOT | fixed yet, although it won't core dump smbd process any more. Still, | access to the shares other than UFS is not guaranteed. Best wishes, Rainer -- _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"