The ("lower ranks" of the) FreeBSD audience generally have a much more mature view on this. They're very helpful, if you ask them questions you might have, but they don't see it as an evangelical mission to keep you with "their" system, because they don't need you to look up to them. If you like it, be our guest and stay, if you don't, leave at your leisure. If you ask, be aware that we're all just acquaintances here, so don't overdo your welcome by being rude or taking the arm when all you're given is the little finger.
This is not an elitist attitude, it's simply the grown-up thing to do. FreeBSD for most of us simply is a tool to get a job done (and a hell of a good tool at that for me), and not some kind of pissing-contest between youths. If you look at the "higher ranks" of the Linux developers, you'll see the same phenomenon: Linux is a means to an end, and probably besides ESR, for most of them not a holy mission. Absolutely, and that is what I had heard about your community and that is what I wanted to find out. I wanted to get away from children, childish behavior, and poor attitude and non-standardized environment most open source Linux have become. Again, this is very, very pleasant and I will assure you that I will not over step my boundaries again. Thank you for the invite, Léonard Lilla -----Original Message----- From: Heiko Wundram (Beenic) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 8, 2007 3:33 PM To: Leonard Lilla Cc: email@example.com Subject: Re: install Am Donnerstag, 8. November 2007 20:11:14 schrieben Sie: > Wow, yeah sorry man... I did not even realize you guys were having a > funding drive. Ouch, that sucks, probably not the support you were looking > for. Just for the reference, do you actually know what Open Source really is? What its good sides are, and what the bad sides are? Basically, even in open source software (like FreeBSD), you get nothing for free. Either: 1) you need it so badly that you do it yourself or pay someone else to do it for you, or 2) you _kindly_ ask other people to do it for you _for free_ (always remember that!) by giving constructive feedback and them implementing it with taking your feedback into account because they need it/want to implement it anyway, but 3) that simply doesn't work in the rant(ish) kind of way you gave feedback. In the second case, you're not guaranteed that anybody will actually take the time to implement what you would like to see in the system, because they may (and most probably will) have a completely different prioritization of the multitude of open things to take into consideration in building a functional and stable operating system. > But I have heard some great things about FreeBSD as a server. Now I > saw that there was a 'dummy downed' version and I thought I would give it a > go. And man, that was not pleasant. Sure, fine, it wasn't pleasant for you. We've heard that now. I personally couldn't care less (and wouldn't be a volunteer to take on any form of redesign of the installer), because I had absolutely no problems with the installation process when I first installed FreeBSD about half a year ago _after reading the manual_ (yes, I'm a sort of freshman to *BSD too) and neither for the multitude of times since then (well, to be fair: I didn't go the 2-CD-way yet, I always did a net-install). I switched to FreeBSD because of licensing issues with the Bluetooth stack of Linux (and especially the BlueZ-userland, because every, even the basic system headers, are licensed under the GPL), because I develop, amongst other development for the mobile segment, commercial Bluetooth applications as a day-job, and for me it's most certainly not the installer that's a concern, but the Bluetooth subsystem. Guess what would happen if I were to beg the Bluetooth maintainer of FreeBSD at every turn to implement functionality I need (or to fix that which is partially "broken" or incomplete in FreeBSD [sorry Maksim, if you're reading this, I most certainly don't mean to belittle your work on the BT stack by this, but I'm talking about missing SCO support and such]), or would simply whine on the list about how FreeBSD is so utterly bad because its Bluetooth support isn't as "enhanced" as the Linux one: noone else would react positively to my whining either, because most probably they don't need it. Anyway, after having the first and second look at the system (because of FreeBSD's much more liberal licensing) and evaluating whether it was sensible to build on that which was already finished, I sat down and started to implement my additional requirements, and after some time even switched my desktop to FreeBSD (from Gentoo, which I was the ultimate fanboy of before that for quite some time), because I was starting to like it. All of my tweaking is possible because FreeBSD is open source, but with it comes the price of having to lay hands on the system in case I'm not satisfied with it. If the second look at FreeBSD would've turned out to discourage me from going further, I would've most certainly turned away, and I guess noone on the list would've shed a tear even if I'd have written a mail like yours giving people the "hard" goodbye. And, just to get back to what I wrote in the last mail: if you're not happy with FreeBSD, do yourself a favor and turn away. And do it with dignity. But if you decide to stay, be welcome, but if you feel something needs fixing, don't whine about it, but take it in your own hands. By the multitude of ways you can do so (PR, anyone?). > If I may help you ask? Sure. I would > suggest the team working on the UI for the install to think about their > action following a condition a little better. That would not result in the > user not having to find themselves in frustrating situations like the one I > was in. Being that I chose various port options. At the end the install > shows a list to review, containing categories and sub categories. After all > selection is complete and install is in progress, I was prompted for CD one > as if it needed the info for the categories list, and then it would ask for > CD two to acquire the info for each subcategory. Just have them create a > list kept in memory with all port requirements and build port install from > CD2 using list from CD1 in memory. I don't know that much about > programming, but I do believe that you must be able to do that, right? So it seems you do know something about programming and about UI designing. Would it be too much to ask to actually take the time to read the sysinstall source (which is pretty well readable by the way), and to check why the decisions were taken as they were? And to prepare a patch or just a recommended screen order for sysinstall, which you can then submit via a PR request? Maybe someone takes the time to implement what you request, but most probably, it'll then be because they wanted to implement it anyway (because they found the install similarily irritating). > Well, again... I do apologize for my comments, but I had to know > what kind of community it is that I am presented with. I must say that your > response shows a very interesting aspect of your community that I have been > hearing about. Perhaps I will continue to stay informed about your > community. I really don't know what you're trying to tell me by this, but I guess you're trying to say something like the following, which I think is very true (and was something that made me stay with FreeBSD on the second look I mentioned above): Linux tries to be the better Windows and development efforts (by a lot of people) are driven by the desire to improve usability and simplicity of the system, simply because lots of developers take satisfaction out of being "better" than Windows and equally "accessible" even for the computer-agnostic. It's basically the wish of being "1337", cool, whatever (because of using a "non-standard" system, thereby being non-conformant), combined with the desire of the individual developer to "shine" in the community with his contribution to get some extra recognition in his "3733t" circles. That's why you'll easily get (the "lower ranks" of) Linux developers and users to react to your kind of comments with all kinds of replies, ranging from most stupid back-flaming and "M$-fanboy" name-calling up to offers to help you in the process of installation such as coming over to visit you, and lots of other things equally over-the-top (at least for my taste). The ("lower ranks" of the) FreeBSD audience generally have a much more mature view on this. They're very helpful, if you ask them questions you might have, but they don't see it as an evangelical mission to keep you with "their" system, because they don't need you to look up to them. If you like it, be our guest and stay, if you don't, leave at your leisure. If you ask, be aware that we're all just acquaintances here, so don't overdo your welcome by being rude or taking the arm when all you're given is the little finger. This is not an elitist attitude, it's simply the grown-up thing to do. FreeBSD for most of us simply is a tool to get a job done (and a hell of a good tool at that for me), and not some kind of pissing-contest between youths. If you look at the "higher ranks" of the Linux developers, you'll see the same phenomenon: Linux is a means to an end, and probably besides ESR, for most of them not a holy mission. PS: I'm posting this to questions@, too (even though you didn't with your mail to me), because I think this discussion deserves a broader audience than just a private mail exchange. PPS: Don't understand the term "lower rank" and "higher rank" in a wrong way: every community has "celebrities" in one way or another, even FreeBSD. I personally would most certainly qualify myself as "lower rank." Others (for example comitters, easily recognizable by the @freebsd.org mail-address) most certainly are "high rankers." -- Heiko Wundram Product & Application Development _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"