On Nov 12, 2007 9:08 PM, Alupului Costin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I seem to have quite a problem with PF. I have set up a bridge to
> shape my upstream traffic. I use ALTQ with hfsc discipline; but that's
> not really important. My problem comes with the filter rules. I have
> to use keep state because of the speed benefits (really I don't have a
> choice), but PF has a problem when the clients passing traffic through
> the bridge use TCP window scaling. Here is an example of four filter
> rules that I thought should work to pass the traffic from one client
> through the bridge and create a state:
>
> pass in quick on vlan0 from any to anIP/32
> pass out quick on vlan0 from anIP/32 to any keep state queue ul_client
> pass in quick on vlan1 from anIP/32 to any
> pass out quick on vlan1 from any to anIP/32 keep state queue dl_client
>
> The above rules generate state-mismatches. I thought that would be
> because pf doesn't see the SYN packet, although it does (one of the
> out rules) and should create the state then... I tried writing all the
> rules with keep state (even the inbound ones) but then nothing would
> work at all. My intention was to create if-bound states, but I
> switched back to floating states in the hope that pf would associate
> the state created by an outbound rule with the traffic returning on
> another interface of the bridge; still didn't work.
>
> I have read the man page for if_bridge and set the following sysctl variables:
>
> net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 1
> net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 0
> net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1
>
> I have also read some posts on the web that said that pf simply
> doesn't have all the hooks necesary to do the filtering inbound and
> outbound, but reading the pfil man page I seem to disaggree with that.
>
> Has anyone encountered the same problem? And, more important: if i
> give up the bridge setup and switch to routing, would that have any
> effect? I.E: will I then be able to use keep state with the inbound
> rules?
>
> Any help at all would be hugely appreciated as I am trying for about a
> week to sort out this problem and can't seem to get any closer. The
> only solution was to kindly ask my clients using TCP window scaling
> (Vista mostly) to turn off this feature... Now I am seriously
> considering bumping my bridge to a router but I am not sure that the
> problem will be solved then.
>
> Oh, here is the setup of the bridge from rc.conf, although there
> shouldn't be any problems there (the bridge works fine without pf, or
> with pf stateless):
>
> #
> # Core:         em2 -> vlan1
> # Border:       em1 -> vlan0
> # Bridge0       vlan0 -><- vlan1
> #
> cloned_interfaces="bridge0 vlan0 vlan1"
> ifconfig_em0="up"
> ifconfig_em1="up"
> ifconfig_em2="up"
> ifconfig_vlan0="vlan 132 vlandev em1 up"
> ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 132 vlandev em2 up"
> ifconfig_bridge0="addm vlan0 addm vlan1 up"
> # Admin iface
> ifconfig_em0="inet adminIP netmask 255.255.255.0"
>

See "Create TCP states on the initial SYN packet" from
http://undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20060928081238

That paragraph explains nicely the necessity of pf to create state on
the first packet of the 3-way TCP handshake to prevent TCP window
scaling issues.

=Adriaan=
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to