2007/11/23, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> "Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > 2007/11/23, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > "Alaor Barroso de Carvalho Neto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > OK guyz, I did some tests and I found the error, like you said, it's
> a
> > > > config problem with the routes, I thought the routed daemon would
> care of it
> > > > for me but it seems like it don't. Please I ask you to forget the
> scenario I
> > > > said before, now what i have is:
> > > >
> > > > The dns server is now with the IP 192.168.1.1. But to turn things
> more easy
> > > > I installed it in the FreeBSD box that is gonna be my gateway and
> proxy
> > > > machine, so the problem isn't about the dns anymore.
> > > >
> > > > I work in a school and I have now this sccenario two local networks,
> > > > 192.168.1/24, an administrative network and 192.168.2/24, an
> academic
> > > > network, plus I must have access to a network of other school with
> the ip
> > > > 10.10/16, because they share their database serverwith us. So the
> FreeBSD
> > > > machine have four network cards:
> > > >
> > > > em0 external world XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
> > > > rl0 adm 192.168.1.80
> > > > rl1 acad 192.168.2.90
> > > > rl3 database 10.10.0.50
> > > >
> > > > They are all separated networks. What I want: 192.168.2 should only
> access
> > > > the internet, shouldn't have access to 192.168.1 or 10.10/16.
> > > > 192.168.1should access the internet and
> > > > 10.10/16, but shouldn't access the academic network. 10.10/16 should
> access
> > > > only the 192.168.1 network, but it's not a problem if they had
> access to
> > > > internet too.
> > > >
> > > > How I would set up my rc.conf with my static routes?
> > >
> > > This is beyond the scope of routing.  You'll need to install a packet
> > > filter.  The best at this time is probably pf:
> > >
> > >
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pfctl&sektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE
> > >
> > >
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=pf.conf&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+6.2-RELEASE&format=html
> >
> > Yes, I have IPFIlTER installed, but if I would want to everybody ping to
> > everybody and then block the things in the firewall, it isn't about
> routes?
> > because neighter of my networks are pinging to any other right now. By
> ping
> > I mean have access. I thought it would have something to do with setting
> > routes. BTW, my ipfilter now just pass everything because I'm building
> the
> > server, but I already have a config file with the blocks that I would
> apply.
>
> That's a completely different scenario than the one you described in
> your previous message.
>
> Do you have gatetway_enable="YES" in /etc/rc.conf?
>
> --
> Bill Moran
> http://www.potentialtech.com
>

Yeah, I know, I was trying to make it work with only adm and external, but
the real scenario I have is this. Yes I have this line, my rc.conf is like
this:
[...]
gateway_enable="yes"
defaultrouter="XXX.XXX.XXX.158" (the external ip)
ifconfig_em0="inet XXX.XXX.XXX.130 netmask 255.255.255.227"
ifconfig_rl0="inet 192.168.1.80 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_rl1="inet 192.168.2.90 netmask 255.255.255.0"
ifconfig_rl2="inet 10.10.0.50 netmask 255.255.0.0"
[...]

I don't know if that matters, but the yes should be YES to things work? I'd
kill myself if this is the problem.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to