On Thursday 06 December 2007 12:20:18 Atrox wrote: > Well, as I understand, in my case, STP should be enabled mainly on > TAP-interfaces as it would eliminate the scenario where, for an example, > ARP-requests from 192.168.1.1 for 192.168.3.1 reach 192.168.2.1. Have I > understood it correctly?
It sounds like you want to isolate the ethernets, not bridge them. Bridging is not what you need, if I have understood correctly. You want to keep ARP and broadcasts to the relevant boxes, right? You have to use VLANs on your switch to achieve this, not bridging. HTH, Nikos _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"