> On December 14, 2007 at 08:03PM Frank Shute wrote: > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 06:00:14PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > > > On December 14, 2007 at 04:10PM Frank Shute wrote: > > > > [ snip ] > > > > > I'm happy with sh as the system shell though; it's light weight: > > > > > > $ ls -l /bin/sh > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 111028 Nov 30 00:10 /bin/sh
~ $ ls -l /bin/sh -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 111788 Oct 5 13:55 /bin/sh* > > > $ ls -l /bin/ksh > > > -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 681584 Oct 6 12:33 /bin/ksh > > > > > > How about giving us all a laugh and posting the results for bash ;) > > > > ~ $ ls -l /usr/local/bin/bash > > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 643984 Sep 12 15:51 /usr/local/bin/bash* > > > > pdksh has put on weight. Used to be ~300k in the 4.* days and bash > about 500k IIRC. On my machine bash is bigger than yours (newer version?): ~ $ bash --version bash --version GNU bash, version 3.2.25(0)-release (i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > $ ls -l /usr/local/bin/bash > -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 676752 Nov 9 11:57 /usr/local/bin/bash > > Don't know why bash is writable by root but sh & ksh aren't. > > Seems like I've ended up with bash installed whether I like it or not: > > $ pkg_info -R bash-3.2.25 > Information for bash-3.2.25: > > Required by: > gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0 > libgnome-220.127.116.11_1 > rarian-0.6.0_1 _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"