Ivan Voras wrote:
> ext2fs is "stable" in the sense that there are no known bugs, and it's
> 100% compatible with Linux. It "just works".
> Unless you get frequent power outages or similar "hard" errors, the lack
> of journaling shouldn't bother you much.

I suggest that ext2+noatime is going to give him much better performance
vs. ext3 anyway.

Said one park ranger, 'There is considerable overlap between the 
 intelligence of the smartest bears and the dumbest tourists.'
Mark D. Foster, CISSP <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://mark.foster.cc/

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to