On Tue, 01 Jan 2008 00:28:35 +0800 Erich Dollansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Victor Subervi wrote: > > toward a low-level language. I am not good in any :( I'm thinking > > Java's > > Assembler? > > > probably my best bet, just because there are more Java programmers > > out there than any other language (I think). But what about C++ or > > C#? Your comments > > I would use a combination out of C and C++. > > Even if there are more Java programmers out there, they not have the > experience of the most C/C++ programmers. > > Erich Yes, C/C++ would be ideal as low level language combo. But a hybrid approach is not bad either, e.g. C/C++ for bottlenecks that ought to be fast, Python for everything else. You can nicely mix and match Python and C/C++ with tools like SWIG or with the Boost.Python C++ library. Give it a try, you won't regret it. Even if only while developping pure C/C++ code, it ain't bad to use a hybrid approach for unit testing, rapid prototyping etc. during development. Happy new year to all. -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"