On Jan 7, 2008, at 11:01 PM, Konrad Heuer wrote:
You really don't want to export a filesystem which itself is being
mounted remotely. If you want to provide SMB filesharing for these
files, run Samba on the OS X machine(s) directly.
Knowing all the drawbacks including reduced bandwith, there are some
important organizational reasons, thus I want to do so. Moreover,
Samba ist just one application on the NFS clients, although an
While I certainly wish you the best of luck, previous experience
suggests that the drawbacks to this approach include not functioning
NFS is a stateless protocol, except insofar as rpc.lockd in theory
provides lockf/flock style locking over the network-- yet Samba/CIFS
wants to allow extensive use of client side opportunistic locking,
which means that Samba really, really wants to run off of a local
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"