On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 07:57:14AM +0100, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> If it is the bytes on the network, I have no answer. > > bytes on network. i want to write my own www server, actually i already > wrote, with working everything except post.
It is definitely fun, but why won't you use www/lighttpd instead? Lighty is an excellent super fast web server with an extremely small memory footprint. I fell in love with it a few years ago, and migrated most Apache-based sites I manage to it, because they don't need all the extra bells and whistles. > things got much nicer than using apache+cgi, it's 100 times simpler and > faster to have it all in single program > > when it will have this tested, i will make cutdown version just to serve > static pages, to replace apache in 95% of cases :) That's exactly where lighttpd excels at: serving static content very efficiently, even for very high bandwidth sites. ;) Regards, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"