--On February 23, 2008 9:58:22 AM -0800 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm finding it especially "interesting" that /etc/make.conf,
> which to judge from its location is part of the base, depends
> on a setting from something in the /usr/ports tree.

Well, actually it doesn't. What gives you this impression?

Paul Schmehl reported where LOCALBASE is set: in

Now I'm being told to add this:


to /etc/make.conf, so that /etc/make.conf needs LOCALBASE to be set
in order to set X11BASE correctly.  Is that not a dependency?

You're looking at it in the reverse of what it really is.

LOCALBASE is set in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk so that *ports* know where to install stuff. And X11BASE needs to be set to ${LOCALBASE} in /etc/make.conf because *ports* need to know that X11BASE has changed from the previous default of /usr/X11R6.

A dependency is a program that a *port* requires to function properly, not a *location* where ports install their files.

Paul Schmehl ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Senior Information Security Analyst
The University of Texas at Dallas

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to