Robert Huff wrote:
RW writes:
And also bear in mind that amd64 uses memory less efficiently
than i386
Would you care to elaborate? (A pointer will do.)
Robert Huff
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
The only 'less efficient' thing 64-bit programs have, are larger
pointers as well as other potenial data items. Though I'm not sure I'd
consider this 'less efficient'.
Ok, so we have larger binaries and a bit more ram usage for the
aforementioned, but isn't that all? I'd guess to say yes, and if it is,
then that's not so bad. In fact, I don't think I'd even call is an
inefficiency.
My 2 cents.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
