> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Dircks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 07, 2008 8:27 AM > To: Ted Mittelstaedt > Cc: Peter Losher; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 > > > Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Peter Losher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 10:18 PM > >> To: Ted Mittelstaedt > >> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> Subject: Re: FreeBSD bind performance in FreeBSD 7 > >> > >> > >> Yeah, ISC just hates FreeBSD... <rolls eyes> > >> > > > > This final report here: > > > > ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/dns_perf/ISC-TN-2008-1.pdf > > > > is LIGHTYEARS different than the draft here: > > > > http://new.isc.org/proj/dnsperf/OStest.html > > > > > > The draft contains the conclusion: > > > > > > You change your underpants once a year? >
I just throw them against the wall - if they stick, it's time for a change. Seriously if you think HP only changes it's product lineup once a year you haven't bought much HP. It's a very common occurance for us to make up a quote for a new HP server then by the time the customer signs off on it and we are able to go order the server, we find it on the "constrained" list because they are replacing it with yet another model change. Ted _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
