On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 23:50 -0400, Matthew Donovan wrote: > I just tried to install imagemagick from ports myself and it installed fine > maybe it's a 6.3 issue since I m on 7.0 or your ports is out of date > considering here the imagemagick port installs ImageMagick-184.108.40.206 >
Ok then, it must be a 6.3 issue. I ran portsnap update and the tree is up to date as I thought. The error is a weird one- the patch looking for a directory that isn't there, why would there be a Imagemagick directory under the work directory? And where are all the source files for the build which should be under the work directory? Instead just an empty file named .extract_done.imagemagick._usr_local. I've also looked under /usr/local but I can't find anything there either. > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 11:53:18AM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2008-05-11 at 17:20 -0700, Johan Dowdy wrote: > > > Did you cvsup before attempting the install? > > > > > > -J > > > > > > > Do you mean update the ports tree? This is a relatively new install of > > 6.3 (last week or so) with a minimal distro and no ports tree installed > > at the time. I run portsnap manually after install nowadays so that the > > latest and greatest is installed from the start. I'll try updating, but > > pkg_version -v seems up to date so I doubt very much it'll make a diff. > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> > > > Sent: Sun May 11 16:46:31 2008 > > > Subject: Imagemagick port seems broken - jp2.c patch fails > > > > > > I may be not thinking straight due to a head cold- in which case just > > > tell me so- but building Imagemagick-220.127.116.11 from ports is failing. It > > > attempts to find Imagemagick folder in the work folder but cannot do so. > > > I ran ls but all it has is .extract.imagemagick._usr_local or the like > > > (the exact message is on another system atm). > > > > > > All I want is to install lives, but this has killed that. Any ideas what > > > I can do? Or is this something to send to the ports list? Time is of the > > > essence here, so thats why I thought somebody here might be able to find > > > a workaround so I can continue for now and post to ports later. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > email@example.com mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"