"Christian Walther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/6/8 Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > "Anders Häggström" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [...] > > Just in case you assume that ZFS on OpenSolaris 2008.05 > > would be superior to ZFS on FreeBSD, this hasn't been my > > experience. > > > > On a system with an Athlon 1700+ and only 512 MB of RAM, > > receiving snapshots on OpenSolaris renders the GUI pretty > > much useless. > > > > On FreeBSD ZFS operations can cause delays as well, but it's > > significantly better than on OpenSolaris, even though FreeBSD's > > ZFS pool lies on a geli-encrypted gmirror while OpenSolaris uses > > the disk directly. > > > This hasn't anything to do with ZFS but on the different configuration > of the clockrate. FreeBSD uses 1000 ticks, while it's 500 on Solaris.
With OpenSolaris 2008.05 the GUI becomes unresponsive for multiple-seconds on my system, and it's not clear to me how the clock rate difference would explain that. Fabian
Description: PGP signature