Andrew Berry wrote:
 > Nejc ?koberne wrote:
 > > 
 > > Why are you using TCP anyway?
 > I'd been having problems with UDP and QoS a long time ago. I just hadn't 
 > bothered to change it since it was working.

Note that using TCP on top of TCP can cause certain
problems, especially when packets are lost.  There's
a good explanation on this page:

The short story is:  If any packets are lost, the
resend-algorithms of the two TCP layers will start
to interfere with each other, because both have their
own timeouts and will start retransmitting packets
at their respective levels.  This is bad, because it
leads to a snowball effect.

If you can guarantee that there will be zero packet
loss, then TCP is fine.  Otherwise I recommend to
run the VPN on UDP.

Best regards

Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606,  Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758,  Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart

FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr:

"If you think C++ is not overly complicated, just what is a protected
abstract virtual base pure virtual private destructor, and when was the
last time you needed one?"
        -- Tom Cargil, C++ Journal
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to