On Sun, 06 Jul 2008 10:25:58 +0200
Tore Lund <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Buff wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 8:48 PM, Conrad J. Sabatier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 5 Jul 2008 19:02:09 -0700
> >> "Kurt Buff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> ...
> >> Do you have both the generic sound support (sound) as well as the
> >> specific hardware driver enabled in your kernel config?
> > Sigh. Always something new to learn.
> Just wondering, why do people modify the kernel when kernel loadable
> modules can handle the sound card? Is it necessary on some types of
Well, probably the main reason most people do it is to strip away any
unneeded functionality. The GENERIC kernel contains a whole slew of
drivers and options that most people don't need, but are intended to
support a wide range of hardware configurations "out of the box". You
can greatly reduce the kernel's size by only including the features you
PROOF OF GOD #501. ARGUMENT FROM SPORTS VICTORY (I)
(1) My team won.
(2) They got their talent from God.
(3) Therefore, God exists.
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"