On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Mel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 July 2008 19:07:02 Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> You can configure named to always send packets using a
>> fixed port number (which can be helpful for firewalling)
> Purely outof interest, which (useful) firewall/nat rules cannot be made with
> dest port 53, that can be made with source port 53. Not talking syntax,
> but "business logically".
Fewer rules for those with a predisposition to being anal?
IIRC, pf offers a policy-based approch which I believe could make use of
such distinctions, but I think the advantages of managing the
ports for querries, transfers, etc. are found more in traffic accounting than in
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"