I'm now wondering why CPUTYPE=core2 is supposed to work in -current. http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10783746.html
http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-CPUTYPE-p10787174.html http://www.nabble.com/Re%3A-GSoC2007%3A-cnst-sensors.2007-08-20.patch-p12334133.html I'm particular interested in Penryn instructions support. Jakub Lach wrote: > > > > Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >> >> Jakub Lach wrote: >>> >>> >>> Kris Kennaway-3 wrote: >>>> Jakub Lach wrote: >>>>> I'm eager to have core2 march, but don't want to mess system forcing >>>>> gcc43 as >>>>> base. >>>> I don't think it is planned to update to gcc 4.3 since it is covered by >>>> the GPLv3. >>> >>> Thanks for fast answer, is there any chance that licensing stuff is >>> going to >>> be omitted? >> >> There is basically no chance the GCC developers will reconsider their >> decision to relicense GCC 4.3 to GPLv3. >> >>> If not, will then FreeBSD move to another compiler? >> >> The existing gcc 4.2 will be supported for some time by the gcc >> developers. In the meantime hopefully llvm/clang will mature enough to >> provide an alternative. It is already quite far along and has >> significant resources behind it (apple, etc). >> >> Kris >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> >> > > Thank you very much for all answers. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/When-gcc43-is-expected-to-be-in-base--tp18736784p18753406.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
