Wojciech Puchar wrote:
(look at how long it took the
BSDs to have native file-level ACLs).

because in unix they are not actually needed.

users&groups system is just perfect.

That's one man's opinion.

i don't know anyone here that actually use ACL under unix
because he/she needs it.

It depends on your definition of "need", I guess. The groups file could always be the power set[1] of the passwd file.

        Svein Halvor

[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_set
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to