On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 09:39:01 -0500 David Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 03:13:35PM +0100, RW wrote: > > > > For most people that's already happened, except that it's > > Adobe-Flash WWW. Google's approach of open-source software, and > > open-extensions, leading to new standards, sounds a lot better to > > me. > > What about this? > http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/09/03/google_chrome_eula_sucks/ That's for the binary. AFAIK the source is BSD licensed, with some third-party components under other open-source licences. _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"