Odhiambo Washington wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 2:29 AM, Grant Peel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,

I am preparing to upgrade all servers from FBSD 6.2 to 6.3 in preperation
for 6.4, and some day 7.x

One thing I have always found a little confusing is what tag to specify in
the supfile.

If a machine is running 6.2, and I want to upgrade to the latest production
release, would I use:

RELENG_6_3 ?


No.  RELENG_6 will give you 6-STABLE.  The OP was quite correct:
RELENG_6_3 will get 6.3-RELEASE-pX which is currently the latest
production release from the 6.x series.  Eventually there will be
a RELENG_6_4 tag, but it hasn't been laid down quite yet.  That
usually happens around when [EMAIL PROTECTED] switches from 6.4-BETA to 6.4-RC
which will probably be fairly soon.

Also, What do you all think about jumping from 6.4 straight to 7.1 when its
released (cvsup method)?

If the OPs final aim is to track 7.1, then:

  * upgrading 6.2 -> 6.3 -> 6.4 doesn't really get you anything
    except a whole heap of wasted time -- unless you want practice
    at running 'make buildworld' and so forth?

  * Upgrading from 6.2 -> 7.0 directly works just fine.  I expect
    6.2 -> 7.1 would probably work too.

  * It's the 6 -> 7 jump which is the big deal in terms of what you
    have to do while upgrading.  Rebuilding all of your installed ports
    will take a significant amount of time, and you're going to have
    to take the server out of action at least some of that time.

Alternatively, if the aim at the moment is to track 6.4, then upgrading
6.2 -> 6.4 in one step will get you there pretty simply.  Just wait a
few weeks until 6.4 is out.

Hmm.... In such cases, it will depend on what the server is running.
I'd prefer a fresh install and migrate services by hand. However,
upgrade from 6.4 -> 7.x should be doable.

Oh, it depends on how conservative you want to be. If you must always absolutely definitely have a fast back-out path in case of things going horribly wrong, then the thing to do is either install a new HDD and set up the target version of the OS on that, or split up a RAID1 mirror, update one half of the mirror and then resynch in the appropriate direction once your testing shows the update to have succeeded or not.

Of course, those are more expensive and time consuming procedures than
are usually justifiable. For general purpose use, the upgrade procedures described in /usr/src/UPDATING, the handbook, Colin Percival's daemonology.org blog and RSE's web pages at freebsd.org will basically work.

Anyway, see this: http://people.freebsd.org/~rse/upgrade/

It's some authoritative source for upgrades.

While RSE's account is factual and accurate and well worth the time
of anyone looking into doing an upgrade, I don't believe it's /the/
authoritative source.  He says himself: your systems will be different.
As the perl folk say: TIMTOWTDI.


Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.                   7 Priory Courtyard
                                                 Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey     Ramsgate
                                                 Kent, CT11 9PW

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to