On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:48:48 +0200 (CEST), Andreas Davour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > >> about trying to make the data as available as possible. Do anyone here > >> have > >> any suggestion about what kind of filesystem would be best to use? Can > >> ufs2 > >> be read by linux? It looks like it from my short persual of google hits, > >> but it also looks kind of complicated. IS ext2 a safer bet? Anything > >> totally different? Have you considered ZFS as an option? It's a good option for a backup disk where speed isn't too much of an issue. > > > > use ext2. FreeBSD handles ext2 fine, while linux doesn't handle UFS2 > > easily. > > just remember ext2 performance is lower, but for backups, copying etc. it > > shouldn't matter > > I'll remember the performance hit. > > > While Linux don't handle UFS2 easily, how much of a trouble is it? I > found a text about recompiling your kernel. Do you know if that's still > needed? My source was kind of old. Just load it as a kernel module kldload ext2fs > > /andreas > > -- > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? > _______________________________________________ > email@example.com mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"