On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 01:19:57AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > isn't the "main reason" because other shells may reside on a filesystem
> > which isn't necessarily mounted in maintenance/single user mode? Or, 
> > libraries
> > for the same?
> > -- 
> > Jim Pazarena  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Just link the shell of your choice statically and put it somewhere in /.
> Problem solved. Why doesn't FreeBSD ship bash and other shells besides
> the `sh' linked statically is beyond me. It wouldn't break ports, would
> it?

It does break ports.  Very, very badly.  I know because I've personally
attempted replacing /bin/sh with bash as a "I have a weekend to spare"

The topic of bringing bash into BSD as /bin/sh has been discussed in the
past many, many times.  It's always a heated discussion.  We went
through the same thing discussing bringing tcsh in (remember, /bin/csh
is tcsh).

| Jeremy Chadwick                                jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                       http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.              PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to