(Forgive the top-posting) Your assertion that "linux is both low end unix and low end windows replacement" is factually wrong: As a high end unix I think it's earned it's stripes, currently dominating the top 500 supercomputer systems in the world, some no other unix has managed to accomplish this time round. Notably, when compared to freebsd it offers support for virtualisation where bsd is nowhere close to doing, just one example of high end unix feature it provides. As a gui desktop, I'm certain kde is a superior interface to windows in many ways.
Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let your email find you! -----Original Message----- From: Wojciech Puchar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:18:13 To: Zbigniew Szalbot<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD and hardware?? >> usage or need. > > You seem to be reserving FBSD only for the experts. I wouldn't be here is someone that simply use unix an expert? no. > By constantly repeating that UNIX is no Windows replacement you are and i will repeat it because it's true. it's every other unix replacement. as linux tries for many years to be windows replacement - it's both low end unix and low end windows replacement, "windows for poor". not a nice future for FreeBSD IMHO. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
_______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
