On Tuesday 06 January 2009 10:07:17 David Naylor wrote: > 2009/1/6 Mel <fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net>: > > On Tuesday 06 January 2009 05:49:22 David Naylor wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> My ISP's NAT, unfortunately, does not work more than it does. This is a > >> problem as I need to provide 'direct' internet access for the computers > >> inside my network. > >> > >> I would like to set up a transparent SOCKS proxy (similar to transparent > >> HTTP proxy, aka squid) on the server. Does anyone know how to do this > >> (and which ports to use)? This needs to be a server side solution since > >> I am unable to implement this on the clients... > > > > http://www.freshports.org/net/dante/ > > As far as I know dante can only be made "transparent" with the use of > client side software (such as the libsocks.so libraries under *nix) and not > from the server side (i.e. tunneling the traffic through a SOCKS proxy). > The way I think of > it is similar to NAT (in the capturing of traffic)? > > Or am I missing something?
In pf terms: rdr traffic, or use something like this: http://bayxao.wordpress.com/2007/03/18/transparent-socks-proxy-client/ -- Mel Problem with today's modular software: they start with the modules and never get to the software part. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"