Jens Rehsack wrote:

Hilmi Hilmiev wrote:

OK. 10x. But my second problem is that I don't know how to apply this patch :(
Have somebody who can help me?


10x again!

Jens Rehsack wrote:

Hilmi Hilmiev wrote:

I have FreeBSD 5.0, apache 2.0.43 and php 4.2.3. I need XML support for php. I have compiled with options --with-apxs2 --with-dom, --enable-xslt, --with-xslt-sablot. Compiling process is finished OK, but when I try to start apache server I get next error message:\
name# apachectl start
Syntax error on line 273 of /usr/local/etc/apache2/httpd.conf:
Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache2/libphp4.so into server: /usr/local/lib/libsablot.so.69: Undefined symbol "__gxx_personality_v0"


Where is the problem? Is this bug? How I can solve the problem?

10x in advanced to all!


If you just grep the ports-list archives, you'll find at PR/46268 a problem record which describes the problem and provides a fix. Even you recognize that yesterday 2 guys talked about the committing of this patch.


Check the PR at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=46268 and apply the patch. Rebuild sablot and than php compile should work, too.

Jens



1st: Do not toppost 2nd: try typing 'man patch'

Jens

name# pwd /usr/ports/textproc/sablotron/work/Sablot-0.96 name# patch -c < sablot-make.diff Hmm... I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere. name#

OR

name# patch  < sablot-make.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- sablot-make.diff begins here ---
|--- Makefile.orig      Sat Dec 14 10:42:52 2002
|+++ Makefile   Sat Dec 14 11:16:05 2002
--------------------------
Patching file Makefile using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 33.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to Makefile.rej
Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
done
name#

Realy I don't know how to do ... What is wrong now? I try to compuile Sablot again with patch, but patch does not applay. Why?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message

Reply via email to