Вы писали 27 января 2009 г., 1:57:10:
CS> On Jan 26, 2009, at 3:34 PM, KES wrote:
>> I can not setup two ADSL PPPoE Links to same provider.
>> Because of imposibility to setup route for second connection
>> First connection gets:
>> ng0: flags=88d1<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST>
>> metric 0 mtu 1492
>> inet 126.96.36.199 --> 188.8.131.52 netmask 0xffffffff
>> Second can not be established because of:
>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Add address
>> 184.108.40.206/32->220.127.116.11 to ng1
>> Jan 27 01:27:55 kes mpd: [UKR_B4] IFACE: Adding IPv4 address to ng1
>> failed: File exists
CS> You should talk to your network provider and ask them whether they
CS> want you to do multilink PPP or IEEE 802.3ad link aggregation. Either
CS> way, the bonding of the two connections should give you a single
CS> virtual network interface (tunX for the first, probably, and laggX in
CS> the second case) which has only a single route.
CS> For example:
CS> ...talks about "After you configure the LAG bundle, you can route IP
CS> traffic over it, create a VLAN over it, or route PPPoE traffic over it."
I do not want to aggregate links. I want use them as standalone
I had two servers, two lans and two ADSLs. Now I have one server, four
NICs: first LAN1, second LAN2, third ADSL1, forth ADSL2
I want to route LAN1 through ADSL1, LAN2 through ADSL2. LAN1/LAN2 must
not interact with each other. For each LAN I use its own FIB (routing
Only one problem: I can not run setup two PPPoE link if for second
link is leased same gateway as for first
So, is it possible to workaround this problem?
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"