On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Daniel Lannstrom <o...@trekdanne.se> wrote: > Why is this not a good idea? The only reason I can think of it that you > want your root shell on the root hard drive. As many system use a > separate partition for /usr and that bash installs to /usr/local/bin per > default I can see how that can cause troubles. But are there any other > reasons? Unstability in bash? Unexpected behaivor causing more harm in a > root shell? >
This explains one of the reasons not to change root's shell: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/security.html#TOOR-ACCOUNT -- Glen Barber _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"