OT now, but in high i/o envs with high concurrency needs, RAID5 is still the 
way to go, esp if 90% of i/o is reads. Of course it depends on file size / type 
as well... Anyway, let's sum it up with "a storage subsystem is only as fast as 
its slowest link"

----- Original Message -----
From: Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Bill Moran <wmo...@potentialtech.com>
Cc: Gary Gatten; Benjamin Krueger <benja...@seattlefenix.net>; 
freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org <freebsd-performa...@freebsd.org>; Olivier 
Mueller <om-lists-...@omx.ch>; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 
Sent: Wed May 06 13:31:53 2009
Subject: Re: filesystem: 12h to delete 32GB of data

> yes, some of them suck royally.

you should rather say "some of them doesn't suck".

<font size="1">
<div style='border:none;border-bottom:double windowtext 2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 
1.0pt 0in'>
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient
 and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential.
 If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
 any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email
 and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited.  If you have
 received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by
 return email and delete this email from your system."

freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to