On Tue, 26 May 2009 16:47:15 +0300, Ivailo Tanusheff <i.tanush...@procreditbank.bg> wrote: > If that was the case it would say something like 108%, not -83%.
Yes, this makes it really strange. I didn't recognize it at first sight, because of the missing header: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/aacd0s1d 2.9G -2.2G 4.9G -83% /var Another thing that I recognize right now is the device name - aacd0s1d - which refers to the "Adaptec AdvancedRAID Controller driver" (aac / d0 / s1 / d); maybe some disk data is reported wrong by the controller? Not much likely, too... > The other strange value is the used size -2.2G. > I see only 2 options: > - Buffer overflow of the command (not much likely) > - Problem with the data on the disk. This could be determined by running # du -sh /var and compare the "total" result to the size of the /var slice (/dev/aacd0s1d). In any case, a check in SUM with unmounted partition would be good, as you mentioned. > Maybe you should run fsck -fFyv /var -- Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"