On Thu, 28 May 2009 12:24:30 +0100 RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 28 May 2009 07:49:12 +0200 > Mel Flynn <mel.flynn+fbsd.questi...@mailing.thruhere.net> wrote: > > > On Thursday 28 May 2009 03:13:46 RW wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 May 2009 22:56:10 +0200 > > > > > > Roland Smith <rsm...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > > > Using e.g. 'portmaster --clean-distfiles-all' only removes those > > > > distfiles that do not belong to installed ports. > > > > > > I've not used it myself, but there is also a shell script called > > > distviper in bsdadminscripts which supports both of distclean's > > > modes without the ruby dependence. > > > > What ruby dependence in portmaster? He said portMASTER not > > portUPGRADE. > > I wrote: "supports both of distclean's modes without the ruby > dependence". > > Portmaster only supports one of the modes, distclean has a ruby > dependence. Sorry, that should have been portsclean not distclean. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"