On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 05:44:29PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
> 2009/5/27 Wojciech Puchar <woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>:
> >>
> >> It is NOT an opinion that you were rude in your reply, and it is NOT
> >> an opinion that it's not your place to advise on how much constitutes
> >> an 'acceptable' or 'sufficient' donation.
> >>
> >> You were just plain wrong in doing so, and you should either quietly
> >> stop replying defending your actions, or even perhaps admit you were
> >> wrong and apologise.
> >>
> > just another funny post - it's not an opinion, it's a fact BECAUSE YOU
> Why did you (attempt to) answer the question in the first place then?

Maybe he's trolling.  Look how successful he was at instigating a flame
war. . . .

Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Quoth Bill McKibben: "The laws of Congress and the laws of physics have
grown increasingly divergent, and the laws of physics are not likely to

Attachment: pgp51FXEmpwTC.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to