On Tuesday 09 June 2009 04:18:10 Grünewald Michaël wrote: > Le 8 juin 09 à 23:20, Polytropon a écrit : > > On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:12:17 +0200, Roland Smith <rsm...@xs4all.nl> > > > > wrote: > >> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 11:52:17PM -0500, Lars Eighner wrote: > >>> What I need most is to find (a) make tutorial(s) that do not > >>> suppose make is > >>> being used for compling c/c++ programs. Yes, I know, that is > >>> mostly why > >>> make exists, but many tutorials plunge right into C examples with > >>> implicit C > >>> rules, while -- it seems to me -- make could be much more useful > >>> for a > >>> variety of things, and I could sure use more of the general and > >>> arbitrary > >>> examples. > >> > >> I use make to e.g. build complex LaTeX documents with included > >> gnuplot > >> graphs. Works like a charm. But that it is not conceptually different > >> from compiling a C program. > > > > Correct. I do the same here. > > I also do use make to produce LaTeX documents. I even `published' my > collection of makefiles at https://gna.org/projects/bsdmakepscripts/
And I'm using a heavily customized version of this CA setup: http://sial.org/howto/openssl/ca/ -- Mel _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"