Wednesday, 17 June 2009 at 10:02:47 +0300, Manolis Kiagias said: > Chris Whitehouse wrote: > > > > > > I would vote for including openoffice, it takes much longer to compile > > than to download, or maybe make the package and any dependencies that > > are not already included available as a separate tarball. > > > > I've implemented this neat idea, the tarball is here: > > http://freebsd.dev-urandom.com/iso/i386/xfce-desktop/openoffice.tar.gz > > Instructions: > > http://freebsd.dev-urandom.com/iso/i386/xfce-desktop/README.openoffice
Manolis, Just wanted to say thanks so much for the openoffice package and clear instructions. I've never managed to successfully run openoffice on FreeBSD, but now I'm up and running. Great job, thanks. Peter Harrison. > > As a matter of fact, I noticed only the main openoffice package is > needed - every other run dependency is already present in the XFCE iso. > The few other packages in the tarball are build dependencies. > _______________________________________________ > firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ email@example.com mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"