xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote: > On 2009-07-11 16:37:20, Steve Bertrand wrote: >> xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote: >>> On 2009-07-11 15:08:04, Steve Bertrand wrote: >>>> Perhaps it is as simple as cron-ing something like the following (of >>>> course, replace "zpool scrub" with my cat commands. >>> Problem is that 'zpool scrub' immediately returns with a success >>> error code if command line option parsing went OK and the specified >>> pools actually exist. You have to manually check the output of 'zpool >>> status' >>> to see if the scrub executed with no errors (and that may be hours >>> later). >> Ok. What is your ultimate goal? Is it to: >> >> - run the first scrub >> - search for an "ok" err status upon return >> - begin the second scrub > > Yep. > >> If (in your case) the first scrub fails, is it still feasible to run the >> second scrub anyway? If it is, then chaining the commands together >> *should* work (however, I've never tested whether '&&' will continue >> upon certain 'failures', but so long as the first command _exits_, you >> should be alright). > > I've just realised that the documentation is somewhat misleading. > > Seems I can actually just do: > > # zpool scrub backup > # zpool scrub storage > > ... and it'll run for both. The manual page made it sound as if > only one scrub operation could be running at one time, across all > pools.
Nice! Now ensure you submit some text to the maintainers that may help clarify this in the documentation ;) Steve
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature