Richard Mahlerwein wrote:
With 4 drives, you could get much, much higher performance out of RAID10 (which is alternatively called RAID0+1 or RAID1+0 depending on the manufacturer
Uh -- no. RAID10 and RAID0+1 are superficially similar but quite different things. The main differentiator is resilience to disk failure. RAID10 takes the raw disks in pairs, creates a mirror across each pair, and then stripes across all the sets of mirrors. RAID0+1 divides the raw disks into two equal sets, constructs stripes across each set of disks, and then mirrors the two stripes.Read/Write performance is similar in either case: both perform well for the sort of small randomly distributed IO operations you'ld get when eg.
running a RDBMS. However, consider what happens if you get a disk failure. In the RAID10 case *one* of your N/2 mirrors is degraded but the other N-1 drives in the array operate as normal. In the RAID0+1 case, one of the 2 stripes is immediately out of action and the whole IO load is carried by the N/2 drives in the other stripe. Now consider what happens if a second drive should fail. In the RAID10 case, you're still up and running so long as the failed drive is one of the N-2 disks that aren't the mirror pair of the 1st failed drive. In the RAID0+1 case, you're out of action if the 2nd disk to fail is one of the N/2 drives from the working stripe. Or in other words, if two random disks fail in a RAID10, chances are the RAID will still work. If two arbitrarily selected disks fail in a RAID0+1 chances are basically even that the whole RAID is out of action[*]. I don't think I've ever seen a manufacturer say RAID1+0 instead of RAID10,but I suppose all things are possible. My impression was that the 0+1 terminology was specifically invented to make it more visually distinctive
-- ie to prevent confusion between '01' and '10'. Cheers, Matthew [*] Astute students of probability will point out that this really onlymakes a difference for N > 4, and for N=4 chances are evens either way that failure of two drives would take out the RAID.
-- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW
Description: OpenPGP digital signature