Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Because people using them, new what they were doing.
And probably didn't care...
> IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the 
> Itanium?
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
> Yes, also Intel can fail. Intel also failed with their first 32 
> bit design. Wasn't iAPX-32 ist name? Long before the 80386 came 
> up?
As I was an embryo when the 80386 was first produced, I searched for
this one...
Possibally the same thing though:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to